Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

రుక్మిణీకల్యాణం

 శ్రీకృష్ణాష్టమి రోజు చాలారోజుల తర్వాత జెమినీ టీవీలో ఒక సినిమా చూసాను. 
అది ముగ్గురు కృష్ణుల సృష్టి: ఎవరా కృష్ణులంటారా? చెపుతున్నా! జాగ్రత్తగా వినండి....
  • ఒకటో కృష్ణుడు - క్రిష్ణద్వైపాయనుడు, అంటే వేదవ్యాసుడనమాట!
  • రెండో కృష్ణుడు - కృష్ణదేవరాయలు, అదే ఆముక్తమాల్యద రాసినోడు!
ఇక
  • మూడో కృష్ణుడు - ఇంకెవరు? మనవాడే, నటరత్నం ఎన్టీవోడు! వాడే దర్శకుడు కూడా.

ఈ సినిమాలో ముఖ్యమైన ఘట్టాలు - లాక్షాగృహ దహనం (మత్తు వదలారా నిద్దుర) , హిడింబాసురవధ (ఛాంగురే బంగారు రాజా), బకాసుర వధ (భళాభళీ నా బండీ), శ్యమంతకోపాఖ్యనం (వినాయకచవితిలో చదివే కథ) జరాసంధ వధ, రాజసూయం,

And more importantly మయసభ లో ధుర్యోధనుడి (ఎంటీవోడి) ఏకపాత్రాభినయం’ with that all time famous song which blared on the loud speakers of every village cinema tent (డేరాహాల్లు) for decades, announcing the evening show...

అదే...
స్వాగతం కురు సార్వభౌమా స్వాగతం... టడడం టడడం 

సినిమాకి మూలకథ - మహాభారతంలో ఆదిపర్వం,
వేదవ్యాస విరచితం అయినా ....
సారమతిం గవీంద్రులు ప్రసన్న కథా కలితార్థయుక్తి లో
నారసి మేలునాన్ ఇతరు లక్షర రమ్యత నాదరింప నా
నా రుచిరార్థ సూక్తినిధి నన్నయ భట్టు తెనుగున మహా
భారత సంహితా రచన బంధురుడైయ్యె జగద్ధితంబుగన్
మనకి తెలిసింది ఆ భారతమే కదా?

దానికి తోడు నన్నయకి రెండొందల ఏళ్ళ తరువాత ఇంకో భాగవతోత్తముడు పుట్టుకొచ్చాడు. ఎక్కడో తెలంగాణంలోని ఏకశిలా నగరంలోనట. ఒకవేళ సమగ్ర ఆంధ్రదేశం ఇంకొక తూరి విడిపోవాల్సొస్తే, ఆయన తెలంగాణంలో కాదు, రాయలసీమలోని ఒంటిమిట్టలో పుట్టాడని వాదిద్దాం, సరేనా? ఆయన పేరు, బమ్మెర పోతన. టాంక్ బండ్ పైన ఆయన విగ్రహం కూడా పడగొట్టారట మన సోదరులు. అందుకే అయన్ని సీమకి తరలించడం తప్పేంలేదేమో?

ఆయన లలిత స్కంధము లోని తొమ్మిదో స్కంధంలో ఒక ఎపిసొడ్ ని మన అన్నగారు తనది కాని exceptional శైలిలో ఒక ballet గా మలిచారు. చిత్రపు నారాయణుడి  భక్తప్రహ్లాద సినిమా, బాపూ గారి సీతాక’ళ్యా’ణం మాత్రమే, తెలుగు సినిమాల్లో దానికి సరితూగ గలవేమో?
అది...  45 minutes of ethereal bliss! తెలుగులో అలౌకికానందం.

అందులో ఒక కృష్ణుడు ఎప్పుడో వేల సంవత్సరాల గింత ద్వారకలో ఉండిండట. మన ఎంటీవోడిలాయే ఉండే. కాదని ఎవడైనా చెప్తుంటే... వంగదీసి గుద్దుడే, ఏం ఆలోచించే పన్లే. సమఝాయిందే? రెండో వాడు సరే మనోడే. ఇక మూడో కృష్ణుడు, మూరురాయగండడు. ఈ రాయల వారు ఏడనుండప్పా వస్తాండు? అనుకుంటుండ్రా? అర్థమవ్వాలంటే ఈ
సినిమాలో రుక్మిణిని చూడాలి. ఓమ్మో ఏముంద్రా ఆ పిల్ల! బొత్తిగా పదారేళ్ళు కూడా లేని అరవ పిల్ల. కే ఆర్ విజయ అంట. ఆ పిల్లని చూసుంటే అరవ పిల్లల మీద చిన్నచూపు వదిలిపెట్టి శ్రీనాథుడు మద్రాసులో మకాంపెట్టే వాడేమో?
మరి ఈ పిల్లకీ, రాయలకీ ఏం సంబంధం అనుకోకండి. ఉంది. రాయలు రాసిన ఆముక్తమాల్యద అసలు పేరు గోదాదేవి. అరవోళ్ళు ఆండాళ్ అంటారు. సిరివిల్లిపుత్తూరులో పూజారి కూతురు. ఆ ప్రబంధంలో హీరోయిన్. ఆమే మన అన్నగారికి inspiration. పాడించింది భాగవతంలో పద్యాలైనా, ప్రతి frameలో రంగనాథుని పొందుకై తపించే కృష్ణరాయని గోదాదేవే సాక్షాత్కరిస్తుంది. 

చూడాల్సిందే కానీ, ఆ experience చెప్పనలవి కాదు.

నాకైతే అది ఒక పూర్తి అచ్చతెలుగు సినిమా. 

తెలుగు వాళ్ళెవరైనా సరే, దేశంలో కానీ పరదేశంలో కానీ ఎక్కడున్నా సరే, అందరూ కలిసి ఒకేసారి కనుక చూస్తే ఇక ఈ తెలంగాణా లాంటి విభజన వాదాలు పుట్టవ్. Avataar సినిమాలో Spirit Tree లాగా అందరినీ కలపగల్దేమో?
ఇప్పటికే, వెల్లూరూ, ధర్మపురి, కోలారు, బళ్ళారీ, గంజామూ ఇలా ఎన్నో పోనేపోయాయి. ఇంకా ముక్కలు చేసి మనకొక ఉనికి లేకుండా చేసుకోవాలా?

 


Monday, April 18, 2011

రాయచూరు


అది రాయచూరు. చాలా మందికి తెలుసు అది కర్ణాటకలో ఒక జిల్లాకేంద్రమని. రైల్లో వెళితే  క్రిష్ణమ్మ ఒడ్డున థెర్మల్ విద్యుత్గారం ఆ ఊరికి కొండగుర్తు.
ఆ ఊరికి అదే పెద్ద హోటలు.  మద్యపాన ప్రియులకి మంచి వసతైనది. మరి దాని ఓనరు ఆ జిల్లాకి పెద్ద అబ్కారి డీలరూ, ఏదో మనకీ కొంచెం ఫ్రెండూ, సరా?

కారు పార్కింగుకి   కాస్త దూరంగా కోట గోడ.  సాయంకాలం, అంతగా పనేమీ లేదు. మాములేగదా! అలా సిగరెట్టు నోట పట్టి చల్లగాలికి బయటకి అడుగెట్టాను. వంతెన మీదుగా కోట ద్వారం దాటి కొంచెము ముందుకెళ్ళానో  లేదో అలవాటు ప్రకారం దాదాపుగా ఒక శతాబ్దం వెనక్కి వెళ్ళింది, మనస్సు. రాజమండ్రిలో ఒకానొకప్పుడు ఒక కుర్ర లాయరు ప్రాక్టీసు ప్రారంభించాడు. మా తాతయ్యకి మద్రాసు లా కాలేజీలో పరిచయమట.
చిన్నప్పుడెప్పుడో చెప్పినట్లు గుర్తు. బహుశా ౧౯౩౦ వ సంవత్సరమేమో. పెద్ద తేడా లేదు. ఆయన కూడా ఇదే వంతెన మీదుగా అగడ్తను దాటి నాలాగే ఇదే దారిన నడిచాడనుకుంటాను. 
కానీ రెండు విషయాల్లో ఆయనకీ నాకు తేడా వుంది.
ఒకటి ఆయన కాల్చిన సిగరెట్టు, అది సిస్సర్సు. తరవాత అదేదో పుస్తకంలో ఆయనే చెప్పారు. 'నారాయణరావు'  అనుకుంటా.
రెండవది. ఆనాడు ఆయన వేసిన ప్రతి అడుగూ ఒక వాక్యమై తెలుగు వాళ్ళు గర్వించదగ్గ  ఒక నవల అయ్యింది. 
ఆయన పేరు శ్రీ అడివి బాపిరాజు. ఆయన ఆరోజు చూసిన శిలా శాసనం ఇప్పటికీ అలాగే ఉంది. 

శ్రీ కాకతీయ కటక సన్నాహ  
శ్రీ రుద్రదేవ దక్షిణభుజదండ  
కడుపులూరి పురవరాధీస్వర 
 కోసగి మైలి తలగొండుగండ 
 ఉప్పల సోము తలగొండుగండ 
 మనుమకుల మార్తాండ 
 రాపాక భీమ నిర్ధూమధామ
 కందూరి కేశినాయకు తలగొండుగండ
వందిభూపాల తలగొండుగండ
అక్కినాయకుతలగొండుగండ 
మేడిపల్లి కాచాయ ఉరిశిరకుండ 
తెర్రాల కాటయ దిశాటపట్ట
ఏరువతొండ గోధూమఘట్టన ఘరట్ట
బేడచెలుకినాయని నిస్సాణాపహారణ
చోడోదయపట్టసూత్రతురంగాపహరణ
కోట పేర్మడిరాయని కంటాభరణదూరకార
వర్ధమానపురవరేశ్వర
శ్రీ శ్రీ శ్రీ గోన గన్నయా రెడ్డి మహామండలేశ్వర







Sunday, April 17, 2011

Mound of the Dead

Mound of the Dead
What was its real name?
Mohenjo-Daro
We know, there existed, a city.
A conservative estimate from the excavated ruins tells us that it was a city spread over 240 Hectares, and probably had a population of around fifty thousand. A conservative estimate, mind you.
http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/138/video
It was only one mound, which was excavated.
Archaeologists have found six more within a radius of 5km. All of them are of similar size or a little bigger.
Now, let’s imagine that some aliens have excavated the ruins of Manhattan sometime far into future while the rest of the city lay underground and unexplored; and they have estimated the population of New York as one tenth of its urban agglomeration.

The table shows the names, sizes and the estimated populations* (Population estimates based on the area of habitation mounds) of the urban complex, which buzzed with life with people of many hues, trading with the far corners of the known world then, between 2800BCE to 1900BCE.
Let us make a small comparison:
The estimated human population of the entire world in 3rd Millennium BCE was slightly more than 100 million. That means 0.04% of the world population lived there. What is the percentage of population of New York to that of today’s world? 200 million out of 7 billions = 0.03%
The population salience of Mohenjo-Daro during its high noon was more than that of New York today and in area it was at the least five times larger than its contemporary cities in Iraq or Egypt.
Yes, it had disappeared, ruined beyond recognition and we call it by the name: Mound of the Dead.
Could that be its name when it was ‘alive’?

India claims a tradition which goes back eons in time. Yet we have no clue what those numerous cities which dotted the landscape of the Great Bronze Age Civilization were called.

Where do we search for clues? 
     
  •   Indian tradition
  •     Contemporary records from the Middle East
  •     Later reminiscences from Antiquity
  •     Historical records
    Indian Tradition 

    It is our understanding that the Harappan Civilization had declined and was in ruins by the time the country was invaded by the barbarian hordes called Aryans across the Hindu-Kush Mountains and they had in time, erased the earlier memories completely and replaced them by an imported tradition which belonged to the lives and lands foreign to the Sub-Continent. 

    There was complete discontinuity for a period of 1000 years before the Aryans built a second urban civilization on the banks of Ganges entirely independently.

    This is what every textbook of Indian Antiquity taught us for the last hundred or more years.Theoretical edifices, built during those nascent years of exploration and discovery have calcified into unyielding political and ideological positions which deter any attempts to set right the errors.

    But now, advances in the fields of Archaeology and Human Genetics have put forth strong evidence that the civilization had not disappeared overnight but had continued to exist even though at a less glorious state.

    And, there is no proof of any major shift in the genetic makeup of the population to indicate an invasion of new people immediately after the Harappan phase.

    And, if we have evidence of the motifs, skills and more importantly the generations of people which had continued into the historic period, why should there be a complete discontinuity of memories: of names, heroes and legends from that period?

    Linguistic and literary evidence points to a date of 1500BCE for the beginning of Indian Tradition as it survives to today. There is consensus that some parts of the tradition captured in the Vedas, Puranas and Epics belonged to periods of great antiquity even at the time of their initial rendition. We have lists of kings and saints which, when seen in retrospect, indicating an approximate time of 3100 BCE for the beginning of kingship in India, a date which agrees with similar developments in other Bronze Age Civilizations of the Middle East and Egypt. Archaeologically the rise of Harappan Civilization more or less coincides with this date.

    Therefore, it is eminently probable that some of the names of the cities associated with the legends captured in the Vedic, Puranic and the Epic traditions belonged to that period and the civilization. 

    Let us list down some of those names: 

    Sonita-pura: The capital of Tāraka, the demon killed by a son of Shiva; Udavraja: The principal city among the hundred ruled by Sambara, killed by Indra; Pātāla: The later exile of Bali and his brood of Rakshasas; Lanka: The city of Gandharvas, which was captured by Ravan of Ramayana; Ayōdhya: The capital of Ikshvāku line of Solar Kings; Mathura: Principal city of Yadavas; Māya: The city of Maya the Architect; Kānchi: The city of Bronze; Kāsi: Capital of a line of Solar Kings and also called the World Capital; Avantika: The city on Narmada, Probably associated with Bali in its early phase; Dwārāvati: A port built by Krishna, submerged at the beginning of the current era. (The list is not exhaustive but would serve our purpose)

    Out of the above, we strongly ‘believe’ in the present location of some. Let us examine the archaeological evidence from them: 

    Lanka is Ceylon or a city in the island republic of Sri Lanka. We have no archaeological evidence of any urban civilization before the historic period, ie. 300BCE. 
    Ayodhya is believed to be the controversial site at Faizabad in Eastern UP. There was a native structure, possibly a temple belonging to a time prior to Mughals. But the earliest levels in the neighborhood do not go below the early historic phase, the period of Buddha, 600BCE. 
    Mathura is a town on the banks of Yamuna slightly to the Northwest of Agra. It was a major historic city, yet the earliest levels of urbanization were of the first millennium BCE. 
    Kānchi is the temple town west of Chennai in Tamil Nadu, capital of Pallavas who ruled from the 2nd Century CE. The earliest dates of urbanization of South India are 3rd Century BCE. 
    Kāsi is the sacred city of Benares or Varanasi on the banks of Ganges in eastern UP, and due to its references in the Puranas and its association with the Vedic Legends, we consider this the most ancient extant city in the world. But the archaeological evidence shows that the city and the surrounding region were not urbanized until the beginning of the 1st Millennium BCE. 
    Avantika is usually identified with the city of Ujjain at the confluence of a small tributary of Narmada. The area has many sites of the Harappan and Late Harappan age which may fit the bill. 
    Dwārāvati or Dwāraka, thanks to Marine Archaeology and the efforts of Prof. S R Rao, is discovered under water - a burgeoning port belonging to the mature and late Harappan period, which came to an abrupt end around 1500BCE. 

    This date is seminal to our discussion. 

    All the cities mentioned above, as per our tradition, belonged to periods earlier than that of Dwāraka. If the archaeological data shows beyond reasonable doubt that the currently identified locations of the cities have not existed before the date of Dwāraka, then where were they? Is our identification based on ample research by the likes of Cunningham wrong? 

    No.
    We know that there was a gap of around 5 centuries between the late urban phase of Harappan towns and the early cities of the historic period. And we also know that some of the traits of the early period had persisted into the later. 
    We have ample evidence from the past that the people when they had migrated to new areas, named their new settlements after their native land and the cities. We have New England and New York in the American continent and similarly an Ayodhya in Thailand and a Madurai in South India and many more examples from the world over to prove this tendency.

So let us for once assume that the names of the Indian ‘Second’ Urbanization were derived from a past, from the names of those cities which had ceased to exist but were fondly remembered by their builders.
We have evidence of cities which existed in the past, which are now called by various names with meanings tantamount to ‘Mounds of Dead’ or ‘Fortresses of Demons’ etc..

‘Isn’t it possible that these ruined mounds were known by some of the names mentioned above?’
A dead end?
Let us examine the other source....

Contemporary records in the Middle East
We don’t get much help from the present state of our knowledge from the records of the Sumerian Cities, Assyria and Egypt. The names presumably associated with India were variously: Meluhha, Sidi and Ophir*. Any attempt to associate them with Indian tradition could only be convoluted. Let us hope that more finds will surface and better reading techniques prevail to give us new evidence from there.
(* Meluhha from Acadian cuneiforms, Sidi of Gilgamesh Legend and the Ophir of the Torah or Old Testament)

Later reminiscences from Antiquity
The early Zoroastrian book in Zend, a language belonging to a period almost contemporaneous or a little later than Rig-Veda, Vendidad has a description of all the lands of the known world, sixteen in all. The last few belonged to the lands to the east, east of the Iranian Plateau.

They are:

14. Varéna, “for which was born Thraêtaona, who smote Azis Dahâka, whereupon came Angra Mainyu, who is death, and he counter-created by his witchcraft abnormal issues in women and oppression of foreign rulers”. 
15. Hapta-hindus or Seven Rivers, “whereupon came Angra Mainyu, who is death, and he counter-created by his witchcraft abnormal issues in women and excessive heat”.
16. Rangha (Land by the floods of), “where people live without a head, whereupon came Angra Mainyu, who is death, and he counter-created by his witchcraft winter, a work of the Daêvas”.

The earliest portions of Rig Veda record a legend of the dragon Ahi-Dahaka or Vritra killed by Indra, who is thereby called Vritraghna, but they do not mention the location. But Zoroaster tells us that it had happened at Varéna.
By the progression of locales mentioned in Vendidad, the region/city of Varéna lies to the west of the country of Seven Rivers, Vedic Sapta-Sindhu: the country drained by Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Bias, Sutlej, Saraswati and Dṛshadvati.
Where, then do we place the region of Varéna?
Isn’t the region of Indus a good possibility?
Does the familiar identity of Lord Varuna with a large body of water tell us something?
Isn’t the most sacred of our ancient cities called Vāranāvat, which is same as Kāsi/Vāranāsi?
Now let us assume that there existed a city called Vāranā on the banks of Indus and look for confirmation in the other sources if there are any further clues to narrow down its location.

Historical Records
The earliest of the records belong to the Roman World, mostly in the form of references and quotations from the Alexandrian period.
Arrian’s Anabasis Alexandri: Book VIII (Indica) records some of the geographical references and legends associated with the expedition of the Macedonian king into the valley of Indus. Any conclusion based on these references is foolhardy. Yet, these fragmentary pieces of unconnected references were treated with more seriousness by the historians than any of the native source material. We shall also do the same while considering them.
One reference which comes to my mind is “the Story of the Rock of Aornos”, which was forced by Alexander in a singular effort, while the legend has it that even Heracles had failed and was repulsed thrice; about which even Arrian had said, “I am inclined to think is a Macedonian boast”. Why was this Rock of Aornos so important for Alexander to boast?
It belonged to past, a legend and probably an unprotected fortress: there was no reference to any fight. The local inhabitants, interestingly called Sibae or ‘Sivas’ had not given him a fight. They said it was founded by Dionysus, who as per Arrian’s reckoning reached India in 6363BCE, which Heracles, a local hero had tried to capture, in vain. Certainly they were referring to an important local legend, a battle or a war which was remembered by the natives.
What was this impregnable Aornos? And, where was it? The location is unclear from the descriptions in Strabo’s Geography: Book XV: “When Alexander, at one assault, took Aornus, a rock at the foot of which, the Indus River flows, his exalters said that Heracles thrice attacked this rock and thrice was repulsed; and that the Sibae were descendants of those who shared with Heracles in the expedition, and that they retained badges of their descent…”
But the clue here is Sibae; Or, Sivas or Sibis who lived in the region. The town of Sibi still exists within a stone’s throw from Mohenjo-Daro on the way to Quetta Valley.
The location more or less corresponds with the current location of Mohenjo-Daro.

Now let’s examine some Chinese sources:

Ta-T‘ang-Hsi-yü-chi, the title of a book found in many Buddhist monasteries of Far East when translated to English, “Records of Western Lands of the Great Tang Period” was more simply known to us as the record of the travels of a Chinese pilgrim called Yuan Chwang, who visited India in the first half of the 7th Century CE. While he was traveling through this country, characteristically he had narrated many legends associated with the places, especially of Buddhist interest.

India is variously called in Chinese records as Hsien-tou, Hsien-tu, Kan-tu, Yuan-tu, Tien-chu, Tien-tu and Yin-tu.  Brother Yuan preferred ‘Yin-tu’ which he said was derived from the Hindu word for ‘moon’ (Indu).
But the earliest name for the country as given by its neighbors of Bactria ( Ta-hsia in Chinese records) was Kan-­tsi or Kat- chi. An envoy Chang Ch‘ien in 120 BCE had recorded this name for India and it was more than 700 years before Chwang.  The most ancient name recorded by Chinese to the Indian territories neighboring Bactria, resembles something like Kānchi or Kāṇsi.

Now a little more specific reference from Brother Yuan:
On the north bank of Indus he had visited a town called ‘Ⱳu-to-ka-han-ťu’, restored variously as ‘Uda-khanda or Udaka-khanda. The neighborhood has a stupa and a Blue Rock of Mahadeva (Bhimala/Siva) at its foot. Let me quote from the Chapter VII, Chuan III of Si-Yu-Ki translated by Thomas Watters: “From Udakakhaṇda city a journey north over hills and across rivers (or valleys) for 600 li brought the traveler to the Wu-chang-na country. Now what is this ‘Udyāna’ country?  According to Cunningham, our pilgrim’s Udyana belonged to Swat Valley, drained by the river, ‘Su-p‘o-fa-su-tu’.
But the name of Swat had always been ‘Suvastu’ not Subhavastu (Su-p‘o-fa-su-tu) of Chwang. The identification is doubtful.
But another reference to a city called Pὁ-lo-mên-tu-lo in its neighborhood points to a location of Udaka-khanda to Sind instead of upper Punjab. Pὁ-lo-mên-tu-lo can be read as B-ra-men-stha-la or ‘Brahmanasthala’.  Doesn’t it indicate the city of Brahmanabad in Sind?

Now, why all the brouhaha about the town Udakhanda?
Our pilgrim associates the region with a well known legend: The legend of a king selling his wife and child to pay his dues to a Brahmin. Does it ring a bell?
Yes, it’s the story of Harischandra, king of Ayodhya, an ancestor of Rama who had sold his wife and son Rohita near the sacred city, Vāranāsi.
‘The Jataka of Rahul’s Mother’ (I am not talking about Ms Sonia Gandhi) associates the tale of a sage called Ekasringa with Vāranāsi. Yuan Chwang narrates that the local legend associates a place 5miles from Udakhanda with the story.

Rig-Veda associates Uda-Vraja as the capital of a kingdom with hundred cities of the greatest demon king, Sambara.  Udavraja means a fortress surrounded by waters. Vāranāsi of the legend was a city between two rivers: Vārana and Asi.

There were seven towns forming a complex spanning a period of a thousand years or more, one of which is called today: the Mound of the Dead.

Was it the same as the Zoroaster’s Varéna?
Was it the same as Huen Tsang’s Udaka-khaṇda?
Was it the same as Alexander’s Aornos?
Was it the same as Harischandra’s Vāranāsi?
Was it the same as Rig-Vedic Udavraja, chief amongst a hundred cities?
Was it the same as Ancient Chinese Kāṇsi?


Location references point to Mohenjo-Daro: 

  • Zend Avesta locates Varéna west of Saptasindhu. 
  • Huen Tsang locates it in Sind on the banks of Indus. 
  • Arrian and Strabo put Sibis on the route taken by Nearchus between the confluence of Sutlej and the mouths of Indus.

Ancient legends associated with the names and locations indicate the same: 

  • The legend of Sambara’s Udavraja and that of Ahi-Dahaka belonged to early Rig-Vedic period vastly predating the historic Benares on Ganges Valley. 
  • The legend of Harischandra predates Ramayana and unless we assume that the epic, if ever it had taken place, had taken place in the Second Urban Civilization milieu.
Therefore, the archaeological site on the banks of Indus in the Larnaka District of Sind amongst a complex of six unexplored mounds, fondly called by us as the Mound of the Dead had a significantly more familiar name, as the seat of the Lord of the Known World, the Capital of a Hundred Cities, A Fortress surrounded by Waters.

Vāranāvat or Vāranāsi.

Or, Kāṇśi, the City of ‘Bronze’ (Kāṇś in Hindi)

It was the most sacred of the ancient cities and the capital of India’s Bronze Age Civilization.

So my next pilgrimage must coincide with a cricket match at Karachi. Hope, I get a visa.

Aren’t you wondering where Ayodhya was?

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Harappan Script :The Age Old Enigma Solved.

Indus Script Deciphered

It has been 140 years since the first seal was discovered at Harappa. Since then, we had many such seals with more than 400 signs discovered at various sites across a wide region spanning present day Afghanistan, Pakistan, Rajasthan, Punjab and Gujarat. A few were even found outside, not more than forty seals in the Middle East from Oman, Euphrates Valley all the way to Jordan. But the average number of signs per seal is just five and the longest text we have is of 17 characters.
Even now we have no clue as to what they had meant. Experts in various fields have spent years of their careers trying to decipher the enigma. Their efforts are seminal especially the likes of Mahadevan, Parpola, Rao and Kak.


Another predicament which plagued the efforts is the extremely passionate adherence to two divergent views by the scientists, with their political and ideological support groups ossified into Hindutva and Tamil Nationalists
Yet
There is promise on the horizon with recent advances in computer aided methods.However, conclusive proof can only be obtained if we lay our hands on a longer text, or, providence provides us a bilingual text - which theoretically is possible considering the amount of trade between the Indus and its contemporary Acadian Empire.


Recently, a friend of mine had said that I am ignorant of the fact that the script had already been deciphered. He was convinced by a book which he had picked up at the airport and gave it to me to read, which proved 'conclusively' that the short texts represented the hymns of Rig Veda with an extremely convoluted logic; then I came across another similar book by a lady which claimed that the pictograms or the logograms were a modified version of their Sumerian / Acadian counterparts.
While the experts are spending their lives and careers in search of truth in a scientific and transparent milieu, the field has been infested by a multitude of charlatans and frauds, who keep claiming to have had deciphered the script for short-lived fame, which unfortunately is lapped up by the gullible media and public.The paucity of material and its controversial nature makes the subject attractive to these academic carpetbaggers.And, it is easy to sound authentic with a little bit of creativity.

Just to prove the point, let me put down a parody of a ‘scientific paper’ (For the convenience of my friends, I have shortened it by eliminating chaff and retained only the juice and rest assured,  usually such papers run into a hundred pages at the least for the purpose of manufacturing authenticity):



A New Approach to the Decipherment based on the Context and Functional Imperatives of Epigraphical Evidence from the Bronze Age Civilization of the Indian Subcontinent.

Prof. Adhoc Speculatrov,
University of Ĝodŋōžwhér

Dr. Kamaal K Kallan
Coordinator, BhéjaKhāli Project

Dr. Jaundice D’ Fraud
School of Barchaeology, Kalahari

Introduction

The Bronze Age Civilization of Indian Subcontinent was discovered by ….. and is variously called …… by its type site Harappa. Since 1875, a number of artifacts in various media had been discovered which contained markings …. A complete list of these textual signs is available …. This article utilizes the catalog of the Society for ….. of …. The monologue ends finally after an eloquent flow of unendurable drivel with adequate amount of name dropping and a comprehensive listing of convenient facts.

Abstract

The complete catalog of 420 signs was critically examined and the contexts in which they were found were noted. A team of experts from the fields of Geriatric Illogic, Procreative Biology, Incomprehensible Epigraphy and Historic Calisthenics; duly assisted by the Apostate Co-laboratory of Hoax, New Jerk and The Ecstatistical Sinstitute of Panacea.

Antecedents

Many hypotheses were put forward based on the number and the structure of signs and their sequence and frequency of occurrence. The paper wanders into 'the' inconsequential details for the exigency of sounding authentic with cross references to some earlier works until a few convenient facts are culled and dressed to support the propositions required for a workable hypothesis. (definitive was deliberate)

Working Hypothesis

It was proposed by a few eminent scientists that since the number of signs exceeded 400, the script is logo-syllabic: like the Sumerian Cuneiform, Linear B, Mayan, and Egyptian. However, an analysis of its sequences by our Team of Exports from the Co-laboratory of Hoax gave us some path-breaking insights. The signs are independent pictograms each with a complete meaning for the users.
Based on the frequency and the position of the signs, it was proposed that certain signs almost always occurred at the end of the sequence and are considered case endings. But by applying the technique of inverted logic based on our ethnographic study conducted by our team at the Trucker’s Offices near the Octroi Depot at the New Bombay Creek, we are able to establish that the sequence of notations is based on their decreasing importance in size of expense and their regularity of occurrence, with the exceptional notations occurring towards the end. This proves that the common signs in the seals were engraved first and the exceptional ones towards the end. Whereas, the clay impressions show the reverse,yet we were able to prove from our ethnographic research at the dance bars of Thane, crowding of certain common signs at the beginning of the inscription is due to the propensity of the transport clerks to provide space for the exceptions and their casualness in marking / inscribing the common notations / signs.
Most of the earlier research in deciphering the signs was mired in the inconsequential debate on language used. Bryan Wells and I. Mahadevan were of the opinion that the script is Dravidian and tried to read words from it. Subhash Kak has shown that it bears similarities to Brahmi script and the language could be Indo-Aryan.
Yet, Computer models developed at The University of Ĝodŋōžwhér showed that the signs only indicated certain meanings common to the users and not limited by the language spoken by them. The wide area in which these signs were found shows that they had a uniform meaning independent of the diverse languages and faiths of people who inhabited the region which probably was as multilingual as it is today: Currently the region under the influence of Harappan Civilization hosts a multitude of diverse linguistic groups and cultures. Here, an example may be necessary. A hundred rupee note has the same meaning to all users even though it was called differently by the speakers of Punjabi, Bengali or Tamil. If the seals had similar functional role, any search for language is of no consequence.
As to the functional context in which most of these seals were found in Moenjodaro, Kalibangan, Lothal and Lagash there is evidence of their usage as sealings on shipments. This proves beyond doubt that the seals had an economic function.
With the clarity achieved from various fields of study we set forth our hypothesis:

The seals were a record of the expenses incurred by the courier / transporter and were recorded on Steatite as such by the clerks of the receiving warehouses and clay tokens with its impressions were issued to them for reimbursement, which they carried back as proof of acceptance of expenses and the reimbursing clerks destroyed the sealings after the purpose is served. A duplicate of the engraving was impressed on the goods as a record of its value.

The ethnographic study of the freight clerks’ notations in Bombay Creek indicated that the common ones are surprisingly symbolic even today.
With this knowledge, we embarked on deciphering some of the most common signs of Harappan symbols below.


Modes of Transport

Firstly we explore some signs which are indicative of various modes of transportation of goods relevant to the Bronze Age Civilization.

SHIP / GALLEY
The Ship: The civilization was riparian. Most common mode of transport was by river. A symbol of Ship / Galley is also the most common symbol in the seals and clay sealings found. The highest and most regular symbol inscribed by the engravers also must have been this, therefore, its presence at the beginning and also in a most casual fashion. Minor variations in this symbol must have denoted the types and variety of craft used. The symbol also is associated with some number marks which might have denoted the days or distances or even the number of craft.

WHEEL / CART
The Wheel or Cart:
The wheel symbol usually occurred in pairs and also accompanied by number signs. They probably indicated transportation by carts.
Carts were an important mode of transport and there is enough evidence from the presence of Toy Carts. The above picture indicates that most of the carts were of two wheels as they are even today.

YOKE
Yoke Load:
Another common sign, with its meaning clear. Even today in rural India, carrying loads with a simple bamboo yoke is common. A number of combinations of the yoke with other symbols show the use of human loaders.
For example:
The above symbol is a combination of human yoke bearer and a ship, probably indicative of loading or off-loading from the ship or a symbol of chandler.

HEADLOADS
Head Load:
These probably indicated head-loads: The symbols show a basket and a sack or a bundle being carried by a man. There was a considered opinion amongst our Procreative Biologists that the symbols represent a flycatcher and that of a woman who is in an extreme need of a primitive surgical technique called Liposuction. Many terracotta artifacts from the region suggest this propensity (see pic)
Terrain Specific Signs
RIVER
There are many signs which are indicative of the geographical features and the hazardous terrains through which the goods were transported. Most of them are simple symbols denoting a familiar geographical feature. However, their similarity to some of the human, material and occasionally esoteric attributes is a cause for confusion. Dr. Kallan from the BhéjaKhāli Project counsels us to  refrain from using clues from religious and spiritual milieu which is in vogue amongst most scientists in deciphering the symbols. 'One must understand that the symbols were created to assist a nascent trade of population with diverse tongues and beliefs.

River:
Another common occurrence is two simple parallel lines, either straight or curved. They frequently occur in
combination with the ship sign.
The parallel lines in combination with a number of human signs probably were indicative of River Crossing, Ferry etc.

Their similarity to the pedestrian crossing signs of the present day is very interesting. Probably they had signs for Zebra Crossing too, but we are unable to reach a consensus as the only sign which answers the requirement is either called a ‘Horse Crossing’ or that of an Asian Wild Ass. Therefore finally we intended calling them 'Unspecified Equine Crossing.'


Mountains:
MOUNTAIN TERRAIN / STEEP INCLINE
Probably, the signs indicated a special consideration for transporting across a mountain or a range of mountains. The last may be indicative of a steep path or incline.
Though there was a logical probability that the first sign denotes a camel’s hump and a symbol for pack animal, which encouraged our geriatric experts to speculate on the symbolic ‘triple hump’.
Our colleague Prof. Richard Cephalus had examined the evidence of some other signs combining the triangular mountain sign and the human sign with obvious meaning similar to his own name in common Americanese.
WOODS
Forest:
The meaning is obvious.
WILD TERRAIN / BRIGANDAGE
The above symbols of wild animals and hooded cobra or lizard probably indicated the wild and hazardous route or losses due to brigandage and the need for protection.
We agree with the learned opinion of Dr. Pulitzer Ray and Animalka Gandhi that these signs, which are evident proof of uncivilized and callous attitude of the mercantile elite of these city states, must be destroyed.
Quantity and Space
WEIGHTS
The signs indicating weights, numbers and space which are essential to specify quantities delivered and losses incurred during transport. Most of these signs were in combination with other signs specifying the modes of transport etc.
Weights:
Their resemblance to various common weights found across the region is clear. The variants probably indicated different units in combination with number signs.
SPACE / LOCATION
The resemblance also of these symbols with some modern icons is obvious and our ethnology experts are still pursuing this line of research and the results would be published separately if they survive their prolonged inebriation.
Space:
The signs indicate the space or the location of the goods. The first sign probably meant half load or half rental at the wayside warehouse or on the ferry or boat and indicated the cost of transport or rental.

Other Expenses on route and Services

Our experience at the Creek indicated that deliveries of goods are always accompanied by a list of expenses of the truck drivers commonly incurred by them on route. The most obvious was the fuel and wages. Other expenses are as follows: Meals, Night Shelter, Highway Tolls, Taxes, Repairs and Miscellaneous Services. We shall explore some of the signs which indicate them.
FOOD
Food:
VEGETARIAN
With major part of the transport being riparian, the symbol of fish probably indicated meal. The sign of fish is one of the most common signs and is usually followed by number signs, probably indicating the number of meals to be paid for. The ‘Bird in Bowl’ sign also probably indicated food of a different kind. The inference is amply supported by the consumption patterns of some of the river-side settlements in the region around Amritsar: Macchli and Kukkad being synonymous with anything edible.

This might be indicative of plant based food, a vegetarian’s meal. But our team of experts in the field of Procreative Biology has a different view, which was confirmed by our study of expenses of long distance truckers: The signs are obviously of their most essential expense both in terms of size and regularity: sexual favors from a sizable number of establishments located strategically on most frequently traveled routes.
SHELTER / PARASOL
Shelter:
The sign of a parasol; probably a sign for shelter or protection for goods from elements: rain, sun etc. Even today, no trucker at the Bombay Creek ventured out on a journey without a rubber tarp. Alas, our friends engaged in educating them of the uses of a much smaller rubber to protect themselves from the most common natural hazard falls to deaf ears.
SLAVES / PRISONERS
Wages & Slaves:
The above signs might be referring to bonded labor or gang slaves and the last could be a sign for female slave, used for either carrying or processing of goods.
Or, were they prisoners? We shall investigate once our specialists are freed who are currently assisting in exposing the roots of 2G scam, obviously due to the connection between certain Tamil groups and the Harappan Civilization.

MOON / NIGHT

Night Travel:


The sign of moon probably was a symbol for night travel or transiting by night.
LAMP / LAMP BEARER

Symbols indicative of Lamps and Lamp Carriers. Torch bearers were probably hired and it was a common expense when transporting goods by night. Even today, you find the torch carriers at traditional processions in the subcontinent like temple fests and ‘baraats’. Imagine how easy it was in those days when the convoys of merchants traveled without any traffic restrictions, dancing to Indian Apache runes.
ARMED ESCORT
Security and Armed Guard:

The above signs probably indicated different types of armed security hired for the convoy and had different expense connotations. Dr Fraud has a different view in her previously published paper. (Please note that her name was curiously misspelled in the Journal of Barchaeology, Vol. 00)
Toll Gates & Taxes:
The sign of ‘Crab’ and its simplified or compound versions probably indicated Tax Passes or Booths. Our team of experts from Inverted Illogic rather that the Sanskrit word for crab is a clue of its meaning: Kara – Kataka.
Kara = Tax = Toll
Kataka = Pass = Gate

There are other signs indicative of toll gates

The parallel lines were considered earlier as indicative of river and the cross sign as barricade or gate. These above signs may be indicative of river, ford and dam / confluence in that order and had different values.
The sign of cross in a historic context and its connection with the preponderant penchant for evasion of taxes amongst the people of the subcontinent was noted and was referred to the Enforcement Directorate of the Government of India, who have been honing their skills in deciphering such issues and probably may find the clues at a new site on the Persian Gulf.

 Conclusion

Before we conclude, we may need to validate our inferences by trying to decipher a sequence of signs meaningfully. Our experts equipped with the knowledge of Geriatric Calisthenics have successfully and unambiguously solved the riddle of the famous seal M 453.
M 453
 We try to read the sequence from left to right as it was meant.
The first sign is a ship and the two parallel lines indicate that the ship was a river craft. Let us assume that the cost of transport by ship on river is a unit and is acknowledged. The third sign indicates a cart. The goods were loaded and transported from the river to destination by a cart and the charges of hiring a cart are acknowledged. The fourth sign is a yoke bearer with two number signs indicating hiring of two men to carry the load from the cart (probably left at the gate) to the receiving warehouse. The last sign is a space indicator: either the space occupied at the warehouse or the location of goods at the warehouse or the location of the receiving center in relation to the city. Now the courier or transporter carries the sealing which also carried the identity of the receiver on the obverse side as an acknowledgment to either the place of origin of the goods or an agent for reimbursement of expenses incurred and also as proof of delivery for the merchant.

Now we can say conclusively that the methodology employed by our team could reasonably explain the meaning of most of the commonly used signs leaving a few exceptional signs which had a temporary use due to the exigent circumstances.
Therefore, we may conclude that the signs from the seals and sealings obtained at various sites of the Bronze Age Civilization of South Asia represent the clerical issues of the receiving centers to the transporters of trade goods acknowledging receipts and the incurred costs of freight and other services.
Further, our study also sets to rest the debate on the language issue as the signs are proved to be independent of the language spoken by its users.

Acknowledgments

At first we must acknowledge ‘you’ for the patience and perseverance displayed and the luxury of time at your disposal in reading this poppycock theory.
The many nameless truck drivers at the Bombay Creek and the Warehouse Clerks who have shared their experiences, Bills of Expenses and other precious data with our research team from the Ecstatistical Sinstitute of Panacea. The list would continue until finally the waiters of the Café Coffee Day who have patiently served an indefinite number of black coffees and endured as the research progressed for the whole evening amidst many a snigger and curse.
References
Ab chodo yaar, bahut ho gaya!